��������

��

• Did the CSE obtain a comprehensive individual evaluation of the student in all areas of the suspected disability?
• Does the CSE have sufficient information about the student's response to instruction in the general education environment?
• Is all evaluation information and prereferral information considered and discussed at the meeting?
• Does the CSE have information about the general education curriculum, context, services and assessments to support decision making to make meaningful recommendations for each student?
• Does the CSE understand the unique nature of the student’s disability and consider that information in making its recommendations?
• Do the members of the CSE/CPSE understand the Committee process and expectations and their roles, including the information about the student, evaluations, curricula and State and district-wide assessment that they are expected to bring to the Committee discussions?
• Are the parent’s concerns and the student’s strengths, preferences and interests evident in the IEP?

• Evaluation results are reported in a manner that provides sufficient basis for:
  • present levels of performance (PLP);
  • comparison to typically developing peers and grade-level expectations;
  • unique learning characteristics and educational needs of the student;
  • development of IEP annual goals and, as appropriate, short-term instructional objectives and benchmarks; and
  • transition activities.
• Evaluation results provide sufficient baseline information for future determination of progress in all areas of the suspected disability.
• Evaluation reports are written in clear, precise, and easily understood language that is:
  • Jargon free
  • Succinct
  • Provided in the language/mode of communication understood by the parent
• Evaluation reports identify the nature and extent to which the student may need environmental modifications or accommodations; human and material resources to support learning in the general education curriculum and environment.
• Evaluation reports provide instructionally relevant information that provides insight into the student’s learning characteristics and needs and supports development and provision of instruction likely to result in achievement of the student’s IEP goals.
• A student's performance on State and district-wide assessments is discussed, considered and documented during the CSE meeting.

• CSE discussions and IEP recommendations are based on the strengths and needs of the student.
• Clear, concise PLP statements are written in user friendly language, and are a thorough description of student strengths and needs.

• Parent input is solicited, discussed and given meaningful consideration in the development of the IEP.
• The CSE reviews, discusses, analyzes and evaluates the student’s progress toward annual goals in order to address his/her unique needs related to the disability.
• The CSE considers the student's progress in his/her current educational program and/or IEP as a baseline for creation of the new IEP.
• The CSE evaluates the current IEP to determine if it was sufficient to achieve educational benefit for the child:
  • Annual goals and special education programs and services were identified to address all identified needs.

  • The student acquired new knowledge and skills, and student’s rate of progress was sufficient to meet IEP goals and objectives.

  • The CSE considers the level of growth in the student’s social interaction, behavioral, academic and emotional skills in evaluating progress.

• Development of PLP, based on unique student strengths and needs, provides basis for remainder of IEP.
• Goals identify the knowledge and skills the student will achieve by the end of the school year based on needs identified in the PLP, and include consideration of measurable post-secondary goals based on identified transition needs for students who are or will be 15 during the period covered by the IEP.
• Recommended special education program and services, accommodations, and modifications needed for student to achieve goals are discussed.
• Placement is the last recommendation made in consideration of the least restrictive environment in which the student's IEP can be implemented.

• Recommendations are written in language the parents and educators can understand.
• Recommendations are clearly stated as to identify the district’s commitment of resources to assist the student in reaching his or her goals.

• Determination of individual needs (i.e., present levels of performance) provide the basis for written annual goals.
• Annual goals, including benchmarks or short-term instructional objectives, are identified to:
  • enable the student to be involved in and progress in the general curriculum (or for preschool students, in appropriate activities); and
  • meet each of the student’s other educational needs that result from the student’s disability.
• Annual goals focus on the knowledge, skills, behaviors and strategies to address the student’s needs.
• Goals are developed in consideration of the student's need to progress toward the State standards by identifying the foundation knowledge (e.g., reading/math) necessary to meet the standards and/or the learning strategies that will help him or her to learn the curriculum content.
• Targeted learning outcomes/goals are closely aligned to the general education curriculum and aligned with the age/developmental level of the class or grade level.
• Annual goals define the path from the student’s present level of performance to a level of performance expected by the end of the year.
• IEP goals and objectives are:
  • instructionally relevant;
  • measurable;
  • aligned with identified targeted needs;
  • reasonably achievable in the period covered by the IEP;
  • congruent with the student’s ability/disability; and
  • designed to support participation and success in the general education curriculum.

• In development of the IEP, the CSE first considers all potentially successful accommodations, program modifications, supplementary aids and services, behavioral supports and services and special education services that can occur within the regular education environment before considering services or programs that remove the student from the regular classroom.
• The CSE actively considers and recommends accommodations or modifications to instruction and/or the use of adaptive technology as necessary to ensure access to the general education curriculum.
• The IEP includes support for school personnel (professional development or technical assistance) as needed to implement the IEP.

• The CSE membership includes persons with knowledge of NYS Learning Standards, grade level curriculum content, curriculum maps, and grade level and subject area skill sets, including recognized hierarchal and sequential order of skill acquisition.
• The CSE uses knowledge of the continuum of appropriate academic and behavior intervention strategies for subject areas and age/developmental levels.
• The CSE understands, discusses, and uses information about “hidden curriculum” (social interaction) issues and considerations specific to grade, classroom or building in determining need for accommodations and supports of skill acquisition.
• CSE considers issues of access, participation and progress in relation to each individual student's needs, including, but not limited to, consideration of:
  • curriculum content;
  • modifications to instructional materials;
  • rate of learning;
  • physical environments;
  • demonstration of learning;
  • instructional approaches;
  • instructional supports; and
  • behavioral supports.

��

• Have the BOE and administration ensured availability of resources to support the CSE process?
• Are the resources readily available to support implementation of the recommendations?

• The district has documented a procedure for ensuring that members of the committee have access to professional development (PD) addressing their roles and responsibilities.
• The district has documentation of provision of PD in an accessible format and timeframe.
• The district has documentation of participation in PD for all who may participate as members of the CSE/CPSE, including:
  • Chairperson
  • Special education teachers
  • Related service providers
  • General education teachers
  • Parent members

• The district has equitable procedures and practices for child find, including procedures for students who are homeless, wards of the State, migrant, limited English proficient, home schooled and parentally placed in private schools located in the school district.
• The district sends the CSE chairperson or representative to planning meetings for students transitioning from Early Intervention to preschool.
• The district ensures that data used to determine student’s need for referral for special education are collected through valid and reliable screening tools, including assessment of the effectiveness of general education instruction and supports (e.g., response-to-intervention).
• The district plans strategically (e.g., longitudinal data on increases or decreases of students in certain disability categories, such as autism, that may result in the need to reallocate resources).
• The district has procedures in place to complete individual evaluations of students suspected of having a disability.

• A full continuum of special education services is available to each student.
• All members of the CSE team understand the purpose and LRE implications of each service along the continuum.
• Students' needs for special education programs drive how the school district configures its special education services/ resources to meet those needs (e.g., staff are assigned as special class teachers, resource room teachers or consultant teachers depending on the number of students requiring such services as determined at initial and annual review meetings).
• The district has a procedure in place to ensure students needing instructional materials in alternative formats receive them at the same time that other students receive their instructional materials.
• District has procedures in place to ensure equipment and materials are provided to support student access of the general education curriculum (e.g., Assistive Technology, needed furniture such as tilt tables, bathroom lift, auditory enhancers) as recommended in the IEP.

��

• Has the chairperson identified a professional staff person(s) to inform staff of their IEP implementation responsibilities for each student?
• Do all staff responsible for implementation of a student's IEP have a copy of (or, as appropriate, access to a copy of) the IEP?
• Has the necessary follow-up occurred to ensure that implementation of the IEP and monitoring of progress toward the annual goals are occurring according to the method and schedule in the IEP?
• Are instruction and/or related services adjusted to meet changing needs of the student?
• Are services prioritized to ensure that the services are implemented in such a way as to address the student’s needs with the greatest impact and least disruption of instruction?
• What process/procedures are in place for parents and school personnel to inform the CSE if the student is not likely to meet his/her annual goals by the end of the year to consider changes to the student's IEP recommendations?

• PLPs establish a measurable baseline of student’s abilities and needs for determining progress.
• Instructional staff use a broad range of objective data collection methods to monitor student progress.
• Impact achieved from implementation of recommended strategies is documented.
• Instructional staff use data from progress monitoring to inform instruction.
• Periodic reports to parents and others provide specific data, in measurable terms, on the extent to which the student has progressed toward meeting annual goals.
• Progress is reported to parents in a manner that is understandable to them (measurable, jargon free, objective not subjective).

• Data from progress monitoring drives decisions made to modify the IEP.
• Staff use student progress data as evidence to assess the effectiveness of each special education instructional service and strategy that has been implemented to determine if the instructional approach is effective with the student.
• Documentation verifies that interventions have been implemented with fidelity (training, observations) prior to request for change.
• Evidence exists that when progress monitoring shows the student is not likely to reach his/her annual goals, the district schedules IEP reviews in a timely manner to review and, if appropriate, revise the IEP.

• Classroom instruction and activities are aligned with the IEP goals and objectives.
• Special education teachers and related service providers are providing specially designed instruction individualized to the student’s needs and designed to support acquisition, generalization, and maintenance of knowledge, skill and learning strategies